Constitutional Implications of Schiavo Case
Sunday, Congress called an emergency session to pass legislation that transferred jurisdiction of this case – which is a case that was decided eight years ago – to the federal courts. This law overturned the decision of the Florida courts that there was clear evidence shown that Terri Schiavo would not want to be kept alive artificially. That decision survived multiple appeals including appeals to the Florida Supreme Court and the SCOTUS.
Yet the republicans in congress were determined that this would be their mid-term cause and rocketed this unconstitutional legislation through.
And President Bush even rushed from the West White House to Washington to sign the bill. You know, because he cares for people. He apparently forgot about the law he signed in Texas a few years ago:
Texas law allows hospitals can discontinue life sustaining care, even if patient family members disagree. A doctor's recommendation must be approved by a hospital's ethics committee, and the family must be given 10 days from written notice of the decision to try and locate another facility for the patient.
About the Texas Futile Care Law
Fortunately common sense prevailed in the federal courts with all three levels either upholding the Florida ruling, or in the case of the Supreme Court, refusing to even look at the case. A former clerk for Clarence Thomas said:
“This is a good example of how things are supposed to work... The law is not always aligned with public outcry, but the law is what matters in court, and we hope for judges who will apply the law in a principled way. I think that's what happened here.”
Source
Even, surprisingly, the people agree.
Opinion polls show that 70 to 82 percent disapprove of Congress' eleventh-hour intervention in the Schiavo case. A CBS poll suggests that overall public approval of Congress dropped this week to 34 percent, its lowest level since 1997.
What I find amusing and ironic is that not to long ago, the Bush administration was admonishing the judiciary for ‘legislating from the bench’ on subjects like the Separation Clause, yet here is a clear example of congress ‘judiciating from the floor’. What has happened with this law is that congress directly violated the separation of powers.
While, as I said, I was happy with the SCOTUS for not hearing this case, I was also a little disappointed they didn’t decide to look at the law. By ignoring that aspect of this case a dangerous precedent has been set.
If congress doesn’t like how the judiciary interprets a law, they can just overthrow their decision.
Right now, as I am typing this, Governor of Florida, Jeb Bush is trying AGAIN to get Florida’s DCFS to seize control over Ms. Schiavo, an act that will (on a local level) overthrow the ruling of the courts (and of course the rule of law).
I worry that the picture in my mind of Florida National Guardsmen storming the hospice and jamming the tube back into Ms. Schiavo’s stomach isn’t just going to be a disturbing worst case scenario, but what actually happens.

Thursday, March 24, 2005



















ewink's FUNKDAFIED Ranma 1/2 Site